Thursday 1 December 2011

The Agnost's Side



The Rig Veda the oldest existing canonical work on earth and the mainstay of Hindu philosophy that dates back to the second or third millennium BC takes an agnostic view on the fundamental question of how the universe and God was created. Nasadiya Sukta (Creation Hymn) in the tenth chapter of the Rig Veda says:
Who really knows?
Who will here proclaim it?
Whence was it produced? Whence is this creation?
The gods came afterwards, with the creation of this universe.
Who then knows whence it has arisen?
Throughout the history of Hinduism there has been a strong tradition of philosophic speculation and scepticism.”
          I am a Hindu. The reason is because I was born one. I could have been a Muslim, a Christian or a Jew. It wouldn’t have made any difference. Alright maybe I would have turned out to be a completely different human being, but that’s not what the point in consideration is. I would still have had this psychological clinginess to these set of ideas that I am supposedly expected to follow. Even if I observe some anomalies in these set of codes with respect to my social surroundings and my rationalizing abilities, it isn’t worth squat. I can make out any interpretation I want to. I can confront any rule I find absurd. I’d always have to fight my way out from the heard to prove my point. Even then the only thing I’d have in the end is me, victorious maybe, but still alone. The world on the other hand would not differ an inch from their brainwashed path. I’d be on my own, out casted, socially and mentally. And no matter how proud I feel for my actions, by the end of it all, I’d still b a Hindu. I’d still have a set of rules to live my life on.
“They must find it difficult...
Those who have taken authority as the truth,
Rather than truth as the authority.”-Zeitgeist [2007]
          One’s religion is nothing but the need of that individual to be accepted as a member of some ongoing cult so as to satisfy his social needs. Not being a part of any religion makes him an outcast, which just hampers his dependence on the society. Praying to one’s gods and deities is just another desperate attempt to hinder one’s own independence and suppress his abilities in front of something non-existent. We argue that we turn to our Gods when there is no way out, and the only option we have is to leave it all to something unknown, something powerful, that we are made to believe in. But in reality, what we do is, we question our own abilities. We start feeling safe psychologically that we are in good hands now. What we don’t realise is that by accepting this help, we put a substantial part of our capabilities aside, which probably would have helped us achieve even more than what we can ever think of. Though praying can be accounted as merely a way of constantly reminding oneself that he has some needs that he wants to fulfil, it also makes him start believing less in himself. The added confidence that now something new, something supernatural is now on his side just provides this empty, meaningless satisfaction which if anything hampers his own efforts. These religious rigidities suppress the process of rationalization. If you are expected to follow something because you cult demands you to, you tend to act the same way. The levels of absurdities, if any, provide no escape. No matter how much you justify yourself, you still live as one in a crowd.
              The humour in this rebel, if you may find any, is that if you manage to break free from the charade, you’re seen as a trend setter. It looks bright and eventful in the beginning, but all it does is create a new path for those who feel the same. The likeminded first second you, then believe in you, and then start following you. This path although relieves them from the existing chains, but their need of being a part of something just makes you their leader. You are suddenly the creator of the same charade you once wanted to break free from. The end is always the same. Change, even though is inevitable and persistent, but it’s hardly ever concrete. The surroundings change, the lifestyle differs, the need for belief remains.  

2 comments:

  1. Outcasts can be of two types. Those who follow a different path and want the others to follow them; like the ones you have mentioned. They become secretly (or perhaps, openly) elated when a large fellowship is developed, and consider this their mission accomplished.
    However, the second type of outcasts are those who actually want to live alone - rebelling against the very fabric of societal dependence. They abhor those who follow them, actively pushing them away. The world calls them queer, but they are kings inside their own heads!

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is the paradox..you cannot be the second type without eventually becoming the first one..

    And what I've written is that even if you're alone on your path of rebel, once who like to follow will eventually get you. There is no type 2.

    ReplyDelete